Collectif Éduc Pop Num Bzh

Online Dating Advice to Use Now
The Slow Burn is Where It’s At
THE UNBEARABLE DARKNESS OF BEING
Avoid These Four Mistakes in Online Dating
On the Folly of Faking Interest in Casual Sex
How to Find Your Niche in the Dating Market
Boundaries vs. Ultimatums

Men say Game is a reaction to Feminism. It is not. It is a reaction to heightened Erotic Capital of women coupled with declining social and economic power of men such that traditional means of matching and mating with women, the economic utility of males, have been dwarfed by the erotic power of women and their ability to parlay that power into economic independence. Game is a means of men attempting to increase their erotic capital that had not been something necessary in the past. The default attractiveness of men coupled with the economic and tribute that men paid to women was often sufficient to meet and mate in the past. No more.

In his essay “”Hegemonic and subordinated masculinities: Class, violence and sexual performance among young Mozambican men”

http://www.njas.helsinki.fi/pdf-files/vol18num4/groes-green.pdf

the author Groes Green, a Danish feminist male, illustrates how in the face of neoliberal economic policies leading to the privatization of most of Mozambique’s businesses, males have lost what he refers to as “Hegemonic Masculinity” meaning feminist jargon for being the breadwinner and supporting females and have been forced to result to what he calls “Subordinate Masculinity”, meaning his body. The men lift weights, take herbs to enhance sexual potency, learn seduction techniques, sexual techniques, in order to combat the loss of economic utility and replace it with sexual utility and erotic capital. You could say much of the PUA community is doing exactly the same thing. I don’t think Groes Green intended to use feminist boilerplate to explain Game, but he ends up doing so. Of course, he is all “blank slatey” about this and uses words such as “domination” to explain “alpha fux/beta bux” and just how susceptible women are to masculine alpha males or males that can fake it for a bit.

But I would once, you read and understand these concepts that you will see them employed and as a significant cultural factor today. I used to get mad when I saw some hot girl reading scores on a sports cable channel because I thought the network was sucking up to feminists. They aren’t. They are deploying the reality of erotic capital because hot girls keep men’s eyes on that channel. It is more manipulation of men than capitulation of feminists.

I have no idea how to combat this power other than men to become aware that erotic capital exists and to become aware when they are being manipulated by it.

I have been able to determine the rise of over time of Female Erotic Capital and I feel that the increase misbehavior of women: in frivorce/divorce, in flakiness, treatment of men, disrespect towards men, bad manners, and all sorts of sluttish and crude behavior has corresponded to this rise over time. I have looked at pics of women prior to 1940, even the 50s, and in no way did women have the capability to exceed the male functional and economic power given what they offered versus what they cost. As stated above, it is only with increase in manufacturing and technology, in beauty products, in makeup, in clothes offered, in diet, in improvements with what we know about the human body, fuck, even in furniture and lifestyle, that the human female is something more than the ugly beast she was 80 years ago.

---